Assisting Kansas' parents and their sons and daughters with disabilities for more than 25 years!

About Us

HOME PAGE

Text Only Version

You can HELP!

Our Mission

Purchase Unique Items and support Families Together

My child was just diagnosed. Now what?

Families Together, Inc. logo 

Pagina De Familias Unidas En Espanol

 

Disability Related Federal Laws

 

 

HOME PAGE

Who are WE?

Can We Help?

Schedule of Events

Where are We?

Appointed Advocates

Links

Family Stories

Staff

IDEA 2004

IEPs & Standards

Newsletter

Our History

Legislative

Parent to Parent

Join Listserve

How are we Doing?

Special Ed. Terms

Translate Page

You can HELP!

OSEP - IDEA 2004

Table of Contents

  GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!

Donate now through Kanasas City Community Foundation

 Support This Site

  • Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF) - Founded in 1979 by people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Inc. (DREDF) is a national law and policy center dedicated to protecting and advancing the civil rights of people with disabilities through legislation, litigation, advocacy, technical assistance, and education and training of attorneys, advocates, persons with disabilities, and parents of children with disabilities

  • Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)-Compliance Assistance - Covered employers must grant an eligible employee up to a total of 12 workweeks of unpaid leave during any 12-month period for one or more of the following reasons: for the birth and care of the newborn child of the employee; for placement with the employee of a son or daughter for adoption or foster care; to care for an immediate family member (spouse, child, or parent) with a serious health condition; or to take medical leave when the employee is unable to work because of a serious health condition.

  • The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993- Public Law 103-3 Enacted February 5, 1993  - To grant family and temporary medical leave under certain circumstances.

  • FMLA Compliance Guide for Employers - The Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") provides certain employees with up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave a year, and requires group health benefits to be maintained during the leave as if employees continued to work instead of taking leave. This Compliance Guide summarizes the FMLA provisions and regulations1, and provides answers to the most frequently asked questions. More detail on the FMLA may be found in the regulations (29 CFR Part 825).

  • Family and Medical Leave Act Advisor - The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Advisor provides information about employee eligibility under FMLA; including valid reasons for leave; employee/employer notification responsibilities; and employee rights and benefits. This Advisor was developed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Employment Standards Administration.

  • Does FMLA Leave Have to be Taken All At Once, or Can It Be Taken in Parts? - FMLA leave may be taken ``intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule'' under certain circumstances. Intermittent leave is FMLA leave taken in separate blocks of time due to a single qualifying reason. A  reduced leave schedule is a leave schedule that reduces an employee's  usual number of working hours per workweek, or hours per workday. A reduced leave schedule is a change in the employee's schedule for a  period of time, normally from full-time to part-time.

  • Free Appropriate Education--The Supreme Court's First Decision - The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case having significant impact on the education of all children with handicapping conditions. This case is Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley, No. 80-1002 decided by the Court on June 28, 1982. The Court agreed to decide the question of whether a sign language interpreter was necessary in order to provide Amy Rowley, a deaf student, with a free appropriate education as required under the Federal Education for all Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L 94-142). This is the first case the Supreme Court has entertained concerning legal issues arising out of this important law which guarantees a "free appropriate education" to all children with disabilities. Two questions were specifically addressed: First, what is the practical meaning of the statute's term appropriate education", and second, what is the role of the state and federal courts in exercising the judicial review granted under this law.

  • Federal Statutes Affecting Special Education - Federal statutes which affect special education and how long they have been in effect. We hope this will show that your school has owed your child an appropriate education, without discriminating on the basis of disability, since long before your child even began attending school.

  • A Guide to Disability Rights Laws - This guide provides an overview of Federal civil rights laws that ensure equal opportunity for people with disabilities. To find out more about how these laws may apply to you, contact the agencies and organizations listed below.

  • Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

  • Appendix A to the IDEA which implements the 1997 IDEA Amendments - When Congress passed the 1997 IDEA Amendments, many of those statements in Appendix C were placed into the statute itself. But some additional issues had arisen from some of the many judicial interpretations of the IEP requirements. So in the 1999 IDEA Regulations, the old Appendix C has been replaced by a new appendix -- Appendix A -- which is 40 questions and answers about the IEP process.

  • How to File A Discrimination Complaint with the Office for Civil Rights

  • Office for Civil Rights Discrimination Complaint Form

  • Office for Civil Rights Case Resolution Manual.  - (2001).  This manual contains the procedures used by OCR to investigate and resolve cases of alleged discrimination.

  • Ensuring Access, Equity, and Quality for Students with Disabilities in School-to-Work Systems: A Guide to Federal Law and Policies -  (1999). This pamphlet provides an overview of the legal responsibilities of the Office for Civil Rights and how they are carried out by resolving discrimination complaints, conducting compliance reviews, and providing technical assistance. There is also information on the impact of the civil rights laws in improving educational opportunities for students.

  • Non-Discrimination in Employment Practices in Education. - (Code No. 12) This pamphlet summarizes the employment requirements under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

  • Impact of the Civil Rights Laws. - (1999). This pamphlet describes the impact of the civil rights laws, and other efforts at the national, state, and local level, in bringing about improved educational opportunities for millions of students attending our elementary and secondary schools and colleges and universities.

  • Notice of Non-Discrimination. - (1999). This pamphlet describes the requirements for education agencies to issue notice of their commitment to operate programs in a manner free from discrimination, clarifies the information that recipients should include in non-discrimination notices, and provides a sample notice statement.

  • The Guidance Counselor's Role in Ensuring Equal Educational Opportunity. - (Code No. 23) (1991). This pamphlet summarizes the requirements pertaining to counseling practices contained in the regulations implementing Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

  • Letter to Zirkel:  A nationally recognized authority on special education law in general, and Section 504 in particular, wrote the federal Office for Civil Rights for an interpretation. Their letter in response is referred to as Letter to Zirkel and was signed by the chief officer for civil rights in the U.S. Department of Education. The basic question was whether there was a limit on what school districts had to do, and had to spend, to meet the 504 rights of disabled students.

  • 1991 U. S. Dept. of Education Memo Addressing Attention Deficit Disorder - In the 1990 Amendments to the IDEA, Congress added "autism" and "traumatic brain injury" to the categories under the IDEA. CHADD had lobbied very hard for "attention deficit disorder/ attention deficit hyperactivity disorder" to be added as a category under the IDEA. The U.S. Department of Education convinced Congress that ADD/ADHD did not have to be added because it was fully covered under current law. The Congress required the U.S. Department of Education to explain how.

  • Joint Policy Memorandum (ADD); September 16, 1991  - While estimates of the prevalence of ADD vary widely, we believe that three to five percent of school-aged children may have significant educational problems related to this disorder. Because ADD has broad implications for education as a whole, the Department believes it should clarify State and local responsibility under Federal law for addressing the needs of children with ADD in the schools. Ensuring that these students are able to reach their fullest potential is an inherent part of the National education goals and AMERICA 2000. The National goals, and the strategy for achieving them, are based on the assumptions that...

  • Free Appropriate Public Education for Students with Disabilities: Requirements Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. (1999) - Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects the rights of individuals with disabilities in programs and activities that receive federal funds.? Section 504 provides that: "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States . . . shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance...

  • Student Placement in Elementary and Secondary Schools and Section 504 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Code No. 19) (1998). This publication explains Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act and how they affect student placement in elementary and secondary schools. It also explains evaluation and placement procedures, the educational setting, reevaluations, the individualized education program, procedural safeguards, and nonacademic services and activities.

  • The Civil Rights of Students with Hidden Disabilities Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. - (Code No. 22) (1995). This pamphlet answers questions about the civil rights of students with hidden disabilities and the responsibilities of ED recipients.

  • Federal Register, October 30, 1992, Part VI, Department of Education, Deaf Students Education Services; Policy Guidance; Notice. The Department provides additional guidance about part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (section 504) as they relate to the provision of appropriate education service to students who are deaf.

  • Students with Disabilities Preparing for Postsecondary Education: Know Your Rights and Responsibilities - This pamphlet contains information for high school students with disabilities who plan to continue their education in postsecondary schools. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader Download Adobe Acrobat Reader)

  • Auxiliary Aids and Services for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities: Higher Education's Obligations Under Section 504 and Title II of the ADA. - (1998). This pamphlet reviews the obligations of higher education institutions to serve students with disabilities. This pamphlet also includes answers to questions commonly asked by students and representatives of postsecondary institutions.

  • Federal Register, March 21, 1979, Guidelines for Vocational Education Programs. These guidelines explain the civil rights responsibilities of recipients of Federal funds offering or administering vocational education programs.

  • Federal Register, Vol. 59, No. 47, March 10, 1994. U.S. Department of Education/Office for Civil Rights. Racial Harassment / OCR Investigative Guidance: Racial Incidents and Harassment Against Students at Educational Institutions; Investigative Guidance. Investigative guidance on the procedures and analysis that OCR staff will follow when investigating issues of racial incidents and harassment against students at educational institutions.

  • Federal Register, March 13, 1997, Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights: Sexual Harassment Guidance: Harassment of Students by School Employees, Other Students, or Third Parties. The Summary and Guidance provides educational institutions with information regarding the standards that are used by the OCR, and that institutions should use, to investigate and resolve allegations of sexual harassment of students engaged in by school employees, other students (peers), or third parties. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader Download Adobe Acrobat Reader)

  • Statewide Assessments and Students with Disabilities: Dear Colleague Letter - The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997 (Public Law No.105-17) gives the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team the authority to select individual accommodations and modifications in administration needed for a child with a disability to participate in State and district-wide assessments of student achievement. If the IEP team determines that the child will not participate in a particular State or district-wide assessment of student achievement (or part of an assessment), the IEP team states how the child will be assessed. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader Download Adobe Acrobat Reader)

  • Protecting Students from Harassment and Hate Crime: A Guide for Schools. - (1999). Published by the OCR in conjunction with the National Association of Attorneys General, this document provides step-by-step, practical guidance to help schools respond to and prevent harassment and violence against students because of their race, color, national origin, sex, and disability. The Guide may also be of assistance in protecting students from harassment and violence based on sexual orientation, religion, or other grounds that may be covered by state or local laws or that schools recognize as particularly damaging to their students.

  • Protecting Students with Disabilities: Frequently Asked Questions about Section 504 and the Education of Children with Disabilities. This set of FAQs was prepared by OCR in partnership with the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction and the Wisconsin Council of Administrators of Special Services.

  • Americans with Disabilities Education Act (ADA)

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act.- (1991). Pamphlet, published by the Department of Justice (DOJ), contains a brief overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act and lists contact information.

  • Commonly Asked Questions About Child Care Centers and the Americans with Disabilities Act - A 13-page publication explaining how the requirements of the ADA apply to Child Care Centers. The document also describes some of the Department of Justice's ongoing enforcement efforts in the child care area and it provides a resource list on sources of information on the ADA.

  • Freedom of Information Act -

  • Serving Private School Students With Federal Education Programs--A handbook for public and private school educators--Office of Non-Public Education U.S. Department of Education October 1996

  • Board of Education v. Rowley - This case arose in connection with the education of Amy Rowley, a deaf student at the Furnace Woods School in the Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Peekskill, N. Y. Amy has minimal residual hearing and is an excellent lipreader. During the year before she began attending Furnace Woods, a meeting between her parents and school administrators resulted in a decision to place her in a regular kindergarten class in order to determine what supplemental services would be necessary to her education. Several members of the school  administration prepared for Amy's arrival by attending a course in sign-language interpretation, and a teletype machine was installed in the principal's office to facilitate communication with her parents who  are also deaf. At the end of the trial period it was determined that Amy should remain in the kindergarten class, but that she should be provided with an FM hearing aid which would amplify words spoken into a wireless receiver by the teacher or fellow students during certain  classroom activities. Amy successfully completed her kindergarten year. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader Download Adobe Acrobat Reader)

  • Special Education Court Cases (Reed Martin's Site)

Families Together Logo with corner turning